↓ Skip to main content

Two cases of serotypeable and non-serotypeable variants of Streptococcus pneumoniae detected simultaneously during invasive disease

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Microbiology, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Two cases of serotypeable and non-serotypeable variants of Streptococcus pneumoniae detected simultaneously during invasive disease
Published in
BMC Microbiology, June 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12866-016-0745-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kedibone M. Ndlangisa, Mignon du Plessis, Mushal Allam, Nicole Wolter, Thabo Mohale, Linda de Gouveia, Monica Birkhead, Keith P. Klugman, Anne von Gottberg

Abstract

More than 94 serotypes of Streptococcus pneumoniae have been described to date, however the majority of disease is caused by approximately 20 serotypes. Some pneumococci do not react with commercially available antisera used for serotyping and are thus regarded as non-serotypeable (NT). These pneumococci are commonly isolated during carriage studies and very rarely cause invasive disease. Colonization may occur with more than one serotype however disease with more than one serotype is rarely detected. Thus there are limited data describing cases of pneumococcal disease caused by more than one isolate. In two cases of invasive pneumococcal disease in South Africa, a non-serotypeable and a serotypeable isolate were co-detected during routine serotyping. A serotype 1 and 18C isolate were each co-detected with a non-serotypeable isolate in 2009 (case A) and 2010 (case B), from cerebrospinal fluid and blood, respectively. Both patients were 10-14 years old. For case A, the serotypeable isolate could not be obtained due to low representation in the mixed culture. Using electron microscopy we confirmed lack of capsule for the non-serotypeable isolates. Comparison of the case A non-serotypeable isolate with a serotype 1 genome revealed only the presence of the rhamnose biosynthesis genes (rmlA, B, C and D) in the capsular locus, all other capsular genes were absent. Nonetheless it had a multilocus sequence type (ST) associated with serotype 1 (ST217 and ribosomal ST3462) and its core genome clustered with other ST217 isolates. The case B non-serotypeable isolate had all serotype 18C capsular genes except for variation in the wchA and wze genes, compared to the 18C isolate. Both case B isolates were ST9817 and their core genomes were identical. The ability of pneumococci to alter capsule production is a potential vaccine escape mechanism and therefore non-serotypeable pneumococci should be monitored as such organisms may increase under vaccine pressure.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Unknown 38 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 38%
Researcher 5 13%
Student > Master 3 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 5%
Professor 2 5%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 8 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 15%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 10%
Social Sciences 3 8%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 9 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2017.
All research outputs
#14,856,861
of 22,880,230 outputs
Outputs from BMC Microbiology
#1,602
of 3,195 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#212,950
of 352,733 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Microbiology
#47
of 92 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,880,230 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,195 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,733 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 92 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.