↓ Skip to main content

Complementary NAD+ replacement strategies fail to functionally protect dystrophin-deficient muscle

Overview of attention for article published in Skeletal Muscle, October 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
16 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Complementary NAD+ replacement strategies fail to functionally protect dystrophin-deficient muscle
Published in
Skeletal Muscle, October 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13395-020-00249-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

David W. Frederick, Alan V. McDougal, Melisa Semenas, Johanna Vappiani, Andrea Nuzzo, John C. Ulrich, J. David Becherer, Frank Preugschat, Eugene L. Stewart, Daniel C. Sévin, H. Fritz Kramer

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 20%
Unspecified 1 7%
Student > Master 1 7%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 3 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 27%
Engineering 2 13%
Psychology 1 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 7%
Energy 1 7%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 4 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2020.
All research outputs
#2,827,007
of 17,136,794 outputs
Outputs from Skeletal Muscle
#88
of 310 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,407
of 383,783 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Skeletal Muscle
#14
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,136,794 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 310 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 383,783 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.