You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Coffee intake and development of pain during computer work
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Research Notes, September 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1756-0500-5-480 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Vegard Strøm, Cecilie Røe, Stein Knardahl |
Abstract |
The present study sought to determine if subjects who had consumed coffee before performing a simulated computer office-work task found to provoke pain in the neck and shoulders and forearms and wrists exhibited different time course in the pain development than the subjects who had abstained from coffee intake. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 48 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 11 | 23% |
Spain | 7 | 15% |
Netherlands | 4 | 8% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 4% |
Canada | 2 | 4% |
Australia | 1 | 2% |
Brazil | 1 | 2% |
Japan | 1 | 2% |
South Africa | 1 | 2% |
Other | 3 | 6% |
Unknown | 15 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 41 | 85% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 10% |
Scientists | 1 | 2% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Papua New Guinea | 1 | 3% |
Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 38 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 9 | 23% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 15% |
Researcher | 6 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 15% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Other | 2 | 5% |
Unknown | 10 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 23% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 20% |
Sports and Recreations | 3 | 8% |
Psychology | 3 | 8% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 3% |
Other | 4 | 10% |
Unknown | 12 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 336. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2023.
All research outputs
#98,593
of 25,432,721 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#9
of 4,516 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#414
of 187,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#2
of 92 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,432,721 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,516 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 187,278 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 92 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.