You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Are there socio-economic inequalities in utilization of predictive biomarker tests and biological and precision therapies for cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medicine, October 2020
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12916-020-01753-0 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ruth P. Norris, Rosie Dew, Linda Sharp, Alastair Greystoke, Stephen Rice, Kristina Johnell, Adam Todd |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 13 | 52% |
Australia | 2 | 8% |
United States | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 9 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 12 | 48% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 28% |
Scientists | 6 | 24% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 60 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 6 | 10% |
Student > Master | 6 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 8% |
Other | 4 | 7% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 7% |
Other | 13 | 22% |
Unknown | 22 | 37% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 20% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 10% |
Unspecified | 3 | 5% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 5% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 5% |
Other | 9 | 15% |
Unknown | 24 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2020.
All research outputs
#1,493,451
of 25,804,096 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#1,045
of 4,095 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,297
of 442,551 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#35
of 123 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,804,096 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,095 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 46.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,551 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 123 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.