You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Midwifery students better approximate their self-efficacy in clinical lactation after reflecting in and on their performance in the LactSim OSCE
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Advances in Simulation, October 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s41077-020-00143-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Aria Grabowski, Olivia S. Anderson, Ruth Zielinski, Melisa Scott, Lisa Hammer, Muriel Bassil, Samantha A. Chuisano, Anna Sadovnikova |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Saudi Arabia | 3 | 38% |
| United States | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 75% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 58 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 9% |
| Researcher | 4 | 7% |
| Librarian | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 16% |
| Unknown | 24 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 17% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 26 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2020.
All research outputs
#6,241,826
of 23,253,955 outputs
Outputs from Advances in Simulation
#178
of 239 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#136,623
of 420,538 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in Simulation
#6
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,253,955 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 239 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.6. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,538 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.