You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Nasal High-flow versus non-invasive ventilation in stable hypercapnic COPD: a preliminary report
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine, September 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40248-015-0019-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jens Bräunlich, Hans-Jürgen Seyfarth, Hubert Wirtz |
| Abstract |
There are no data available about effectiveness of Nasal High-flow (NHF)in chronic respiratory insufficiency. Eleven COPD patients with stable hypercapnia were adjusted to NHF-system with a flow of 20 l/min. After six weeks patients were switched to non-invasive ventilation (NIV) for another six weeks period. NHF led to significant decreases in resting pCO2. Between the devices we found no differences in pCO2 levels. NHF may thus be an alternative treatment device in stable hypercapnic COPD patients. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 73 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 16 | 22% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 16 | 22% |
| Unknown | 9 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 48 | 66% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 10% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 3% |
| Engineering | 2 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 9 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2020.
All research outputs
#3,261,839
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine
#49
of 307 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,792
of 277,000 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine
#4
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 307 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,000 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.