↓ Skip to main content

Predictive approaches to heterogeneous treatment effects: a scoping review

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, October 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
16 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Predictive approaches to heterogeneous treatment effects: a scoping review
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology, October 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12874-020-01145-1
Authors

Alexandros Rekkas, Jessica K. Paulus, Gowri Raman, John B. Wong, Ewout W. Steyerberg, Peter R. Rijnbeek, David M. Kent, David van Klaveren

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 20%
Professor 4 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 10%
Researcher 2 10%
Student > Master 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 6 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 25%
Social Sciences 2 10%
Computer Science 1 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 5%
Other 5 25%
Unknown 5 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2021.
All research outputs
#2,670,893
of 19,192,362 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#458
of 1,731 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,472
of 388,895 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#77
of 226 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,192,362 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,731 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 388,895 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 226 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.