You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Predictive approaches to heterogeneous treatment effects: a scoping review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, October 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12874-020-01145-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alexandros Rekkas, Jessica K. Paulus, Gowri Raman, John B. Wong, Ewout W. Steyerberg, Peter R. Rijnbeek, David M. Kent, David van Klaveren |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 13% |
| Australia | 2 | 13% |
| Puerto Rico | 1 | 6% |
| Canada | 1 | 6% |
| Mexico | 1 | 6% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 8 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 69% |
| Scientists | 5 | 31% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 63 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 17% |
| Researcher | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 11% |
| Professor | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 17% |
| Unknown | 19 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 16% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 22% |
| Unknown | 27 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2023.
All research outputs
#3,291,418
of 24,887,826 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#508
of 2,218 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,412
of 427,466 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#16
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,887,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,218 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,466 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.