You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Reliability and relative validity of a food frequency questionnaire to assess food group intakes in New Zealand adolescents
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nutrition Journal, September 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1475-2891-11-65 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jyh Eiin Wong, Winsome R Parnell, Katherine E Black, Paula ML Skidmore |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 50% |
New Zealand | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Slovenia | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 111 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 18% |
Student > Master | 18 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 15 | 13% |
Researcher | 13 | 11% |
Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 7% |
Other | 19 | 17% |
Unknown | 21 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 25% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 16% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 9% |
Sports and Recreations | 5 | 4% |
Psychology | 5 | 4% |
Other | 21 | 18% |
Unknown | 26 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2023.
All research outputs
#1,870,748
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#465
of 1,530 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,801
of 189,385 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#19
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,530 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 189,385 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.