↓ Skip to main content
Embed badge What is this page?

A real-life observational study of the effectiveness of FACT in a Dutch mental health region

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Psychiatry, December 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
92 Mendeley

What is this page?

Summary Twitter Google+ Dimensions citations
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A real-life observational study of the effectiveness of FACT in a Dutch mental health region
Published in
BMC Psychiatry, December 2008
DOI 10.1186/1471-244x-8-93
Pubmed ID
19055813
Authors

Marjan Drukker, Myrte Maarschalkerweerd, Maarten Bak, Ger Driessen, Joost à Campo, Arthur de Bie, Giovanni Poddighe, Jim van Os, Philippe Delespaul

Abstract

ACT is an effective community treatment but causes discontinuity of care between acutely ill and currently stable patient groups. The Dutch variant of ACT, FACT, combines both intensive ACT treatment and care for patients requiring less intensive care at one time point yet likely to need ACT in the future. It may be hypothesised that this case mix is not beneficial for patients requiring intensive care, as other patient groups may "dilute" care provision. The effectiveness of FACT was compared with standard care, with a particular focus on possible moderating effects of patient characteristics within the case mix in FACT.

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
Portugal 1 1%
Unknown 90 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 18%
Researcher 14 15%
Student > Master 12 13%
Student > Bachelor 11 12%
Student > Postgraduate 6 7%
Other 19 21%
Unknown 13 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 22 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 15%
Social Sciences 10 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 7%
Other 14 15%
Unknown 18 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2015.
All research outputs
#12,569,180
of 22,678,224 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#2,529
of 4,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,934
of 165,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#6
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,678,224 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,635 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,712 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.

This page is provided by Altmetric.