You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Analysis of variation at transcription factor binding sites in Drosophila and humans
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genome Biology, September 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/gb-2012-13-9-r49 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mikhail Spivakov, Junaid Akhtar, Pouya Kheradpour, Kathryn Beal, Charles Girardot, Gautier Koscielny, Javier Herrero, Manolis Kellis, Eileen EM Furlong, Ewan Birney |
| Abstract |
Advances in sequencing technology have boosted population genomics and made it possible to map the positions of transcription factor binding sites (TFBSs) with high precision. Here we investigate TFBS variability by combining transcription factor binding maps generated by ENCODE, modENCODE, our previously published data and other sources with genomic variation data for human individuals and Drosophila isogenic lines. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 38% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 13% |
| Hungary | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 75% |
| Scientists | 2 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 496 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 26 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 13 | 3% |
| Germany | 6 | 1% |
| Spain | 4 | <1% |
| China | 3 | <1% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 2 | <1% |
| Mexico | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 14 | 3% |
| Unknown | 422 | 85% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 148 | 30% |
| Researcher | 142 | 29% |
| Student > Master | 43 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 34 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 30 | 6% |
| Other | 79 | 16% |
| Unknown | 20 | 4% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 327 | 66% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 67 | 14% |
| Computer Science | 24 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 5 | 1% |
| Other | 31 | 6% |
| Unknown | 28 | 6% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2022.
All research outputs
#1,757,174
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#1,460
of 4,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,085
of 186,989 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#21
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 186,989 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.