You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Improving aboveground biomass estimates by taking into account density variations between tree components
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Forest Science , October 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13595-020-00999-1 |
| Authors |
Antoine Billard, Rodolphe Bauer, Frédéric Mothe, Mathieu Jonard, Francis Colin, Fleur Longuetaud |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 3 | 60% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 19 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 11% |
| Researcher | 2 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 11% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 9 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 4 | 21% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 21% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 5% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 9 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2020.
All research outputs
#3,315,899
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Forest Science
#162
of 942 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,914
of 440,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Forest Science
#3
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 942 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,048 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.