↓ Skip to main content

The evolution of fruit scent: phylogenetic and developmental constraints

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Evolutionary Biology, October 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The evolution of fruit scent: phylogenetic and developmental constraints
Published in
BMC Evolutionary Biology, October 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12862-020-01708-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Omer Nevo, Kim Valenta, Annemarie Kleiner, Diary Razafimandimby, Juan Antonio James Jeffrey, Colin A. Chapman, Manfred Ayasse

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 25%
Student > Master 3 19%
Student > Bachelor 3 19%
Professor 1 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Other 3 19%
Unknown 1 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 50%
Environmental Science 4 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 13%
Unknown 2 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2020.
All research outputs
#9,918,080
of 17,601,811 outputs
Outputs from BMC Evolutionary Biology
#1,855
of 2,800 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#186,767
of 385,513 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Evolutionary Biology
#95
of 141 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,601,811 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,800 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 385,513 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 141 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.