↓ Skip to main content

The validity of Iran’s national university entrance examination (Konkoor) for predicting medical students’ academic performance

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Education, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The validity of Iran’s national university entrance examination (Konkoor) for predicting medical students’ academic performance
Published in
BMC Medical Education, July 2012
DOI 10.1186/1472-6920-12-60
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yasin Farrokhi-Khajeh-Pasha, Saharnaz Nedjat, Aeen Mohammadi, Elaheh Malakan Rad, Reza Majdzadeh, Farshid Monajemi, Ehsan Jamali, Shahryar Yazdani

Abstract

In Iran, admission to medical school is based solely on the results of the highly competitive, nationwide Konkoor examination. This paper examines the predictive validity of Konkoor scores, alone and in combination with high school grade point averages (hsGPAs), for the academic performance of public medical school students in Iran.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 2%
Thailand 1 2%
Unknown 60 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 11%
Student > Master 6 10%
Lecturer 6 10%
Professor 5 8%
Other 16 26%
Unknown 13 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 26%
Social Sciences 7 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 6%
Arts and Humanities 4 6%
Engineering 3 5%
Other 13 21%
Unknown 15 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2023.
All research outputs
#14,502,924
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#1,706
of 4,051 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,356
of 179,457 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#14
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,051 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,457 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.