↓ Skip to main content

The clonogenic assay: robustness of plating efficiency-based analysis is strongly compromised by cellular cooperation

Overview of attention for article published in Radiation Oncology, October 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The clonogenic assay: robustness of plating efficiency-based analysis is strongly compromised by cellular cooperation
Published in
Radiation Oncology, October 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13014-020-01697-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nikko Brix, Daniel Samaga, Roman Hennel, Katharina Gehr, Horst Zitzelsberger, Kirsten Lauber

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 40 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 18%
Researcher 5 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Student > Postgraduate 3 8%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 13 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 28%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 8%
Unspecified 2 5%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 17 43%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2020.
All research outputs
#5,237,903
of 19,790,383 outputs
Outputs from Radiation Oncology
#221
of 1,849 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,684
of 392,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Radiation Oncology
#31
of 155 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,790,383 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,849 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 392,554 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 155 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.