Title |
Collaborative Interventions for Circulation and Depression (COINCIDE): study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial of collaborative care for depression in people with diabetes and/or coronary heart disease
|
---|---|
Published in |
Trials, August 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1745-6215-13-139 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Peter A Coventry, Karina Lovell, Chris Dickens, Peter Bower, Carolyn Chew-Graham, Andrea Cherrington, Charlotte Garrett, Chris J Gibbons, Clare Baguley, Kate Roughley, Isabel Adeyemi, Chris Keyworth, Waquas Waheed, Mark Hann, Linda Davies, Farheen Jeeva, Chris Roberts, Sarah Knowles, Linda Gask |
Abstract |
Depression is up to two to three times as common in people with long-term conditions. It negatively affects medical management of disease and self-care behaviors, and leads to poorer quality of life and high costs in primary care. Screening and treatment of depression is increasingly prioritized, but despite initiatives to improve access and quality of care, depression remains under-detected and under-treated, especially in people with long-term conditions. Collaborative care is known to positively affect the process and outcome of care for people with depression and long-term conditions, but its effectiveness outside the USA is still relatively unknown. Furthermore, collaborative care has yet to be tested in settings that resemble more naturalistic settings that include patient choice and the usual care providers. The aim of this study was to test the effectiveness of a collaborative-care intervention, for people with depression and diabetes/coronary heart disease in National Health Service (NHS) primary care, in which low-intensity psychological treatment services are delivered by the usual care provider - Increasing Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) services. The study also aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the intervention over 6 months, and to assess qualitatively the extent to which collaborative care was implemented in the intervention general practices. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 4 | 1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Denmark | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 289 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 50 | 17% |
Researcher | 46 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 40 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 24 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 18 | 6% |
Other | 59 | 20% |
Unknown | 58 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 72 | 24% |
Psychology | 51 | 17% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 40 | 14% |
Social Sciences | 19 | 6% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 8 | 3% |
Other | 37 | 13% |
Unknown | 68 | 23% |