You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Randomised controlled trial of tailored interventions to improve the management of anxiety and depressive disorders in primary care
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, July 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1748-5908-6-75 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Henny Sinnema, Gerdien Franx, Daniëlle Volker, Cristina Majo, Berend Terluin, Michel Wensing, Anton van Balkom |
| Abstract |
Anxiety and depressive disorders are highly prevalent disorders and are mostly treated in primary care. The management of these disorders by general practitioners is not always consistent with prevailing guidelines because of a variety of factors. Designing implementation strategies tailored to prospectively identified barriers could lead to more guideline-recommended care. Although tailoring of implementation strategies is promoted in practice, little is known about the effect on improving the quality of care for the early recognition, diagnosis, and stepped care treatment allocation in patients with anxiety or depressive disorders in general practice. This study examines whether the tailored strategy supplemented with training and feedback is more effective than providing training and feedback alone. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
| Spain | 2 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 124 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 20 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 10% |
| Other | 22 | 17% |
| Unknown | 27 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 39 | 30% |
| Psychology | 22 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 9% |
| Unknown | 30 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2012.
All research outputs
#17,286,645
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#1,638
of 1,809 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,813
of 130,228 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#17
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,809 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 130,228 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.