| Title |
Virtual adaptation of traditional healthcare quality improvement training in response to COVID-19: a rapid narrative review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Human Resources for Health, October 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12960-020-00527-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Zuneera Khurshid, Aoife De Brún, Gemma Moore, Eilish McAuliffe |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 8 | 67% |
| Australia | 1 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 2 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 58% |
| Scientists | 4 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 246 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 246 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 27 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 25 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 6% |
| Researcher | 12 | 5% |
| Other | 48 | 20% |
| Unknown | 106 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 40 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 30 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 5% |
| Psychology | 12 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 29 | 12% |
| Unknown | 113 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 November 2020.
All research outputs
#4,538,680
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Human Resources for Health
#527
of 1,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,163
of 439,497 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Resources for Health
#15
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,261 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,497 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.