You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Embedding consumer and community involvement within an established research centre: moving from general recommendations to an actionable framework
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Research Involvement and Engagement, October 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40900-020-00241-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tilini Gunatillake, Cade Shadbolt, Daniel Gould, Michelle Lam, Marion Glanville Hearst, Carol Vleeskens, Peter Choong, Michelle Dowsey |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 13 | 72% |
| Canada | 2 | 11% |
| France | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 2 | 11% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 44% |
| Scientists | 8 | 44% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 24 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 4% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 21% |
| Unknown | 8 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 3 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 8% |
| Psychology | 2 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 17% |
| Unknown | 11 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2023.
All research outputs
#2,758,836
of 23,860,205 outputs
Outputs from Research Involvement and Engagement
#228
of 415 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,869
of 422,544 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research Involvement and Engagement
#10
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,860,205 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 415 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.1. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,544 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.