You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Breath-synchronized electrical stimulation of the expiratory muscles in mechanically ventilated patients: a randomized controlled feasibility study and pooled analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, October 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-020-03352-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Annemijn H. Jonkman, Tim Frenzel, Euan J. McCaughey, Angus J. McLachlan, Claire L. Boswell-Ruys, David W. Collins, Simon C. Gandevia, Armand R. J. Girbes, Oscar Hoiting, Matthijs Kox, Eline Oppersma, Marco Peters, Peter Pickkers, Lisanne H. Roesthuis, Jeroen Schouten, Zhong-Hua Shi, Peter H. Veltink, Heder J. de Vries, Cyndi Shannon Weickert, Carsten Wiedenbach, Yingrui Zhang, Pieter R. Tuinman, Angélique M. E. de Man, Jane E. Butler, Leo M. A. Heunks |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 3 | 38% |
| Japan | 2 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
| Singapore | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 1 | 13% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 63% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 25% |
| Scientists | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 75 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Professor | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 15% |
| Unknown | 37 | 49% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 9% |
| Engineering | 4 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Unknown | 42 | 56% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 90. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2022.
All research outputs
#472,490
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#281
of 6,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,504
of 440,586 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#6
of 125 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,586 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 125 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.