↓ Skip to main content

No time for pending confirmation of invasive fungal disease in critically ill COVID-19 patients—think empirical treatment

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, September 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
Title
No time for pending confirmation of invasive fungal disease in critically ill COVID-19 patients—think empirical treatment
Published in
Critical Care, September 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13054-020-03307-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anne-Lise Bienvenu, Nathalie Bleyzac, Jean-Christophe Richard, Gilles Leboucher

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 46 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 7 15%
Researcher 5 11%
Student > Master 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Professor 2 4%
Other 8 17%
Unknown 17 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 37%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 2%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 19 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2020.
All research outputs
#7,361,749
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#4,045
of 6,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#155,828
of 432,829 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#88
of 126 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,829 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 126 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.