You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Highlights of the 2020 23rd Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Scientific Sessions
|
---|---|
Published in |
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, October 2020
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12968-020-00672-6 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Lars Grosse-Wortmann, Christopher J. Francois, Lilia M. Sierra-Galan, Michael Markl, Javier Sanz, James Carr, Chiara Bucciarelli-Ducci, Andrew J. Powell |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 1 | 25% |
India | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 50% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Members of the public | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 16 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 19% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 13% |
Researcher | 2 | 13% |
Student > Master | 2 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 6% |
Other | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 5 | 31% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 31% |
Computer Science | 3 | 19% |
Neuroscience | 1 | 6% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 6 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2020.
All research outputs
#15,006,232
of 25,711,518 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#916
of 1,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#217,245
of 442,011 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#10
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,518 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,386 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,011 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.