You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Hand-held dynamometry in patients with haematological malignancies: Measurement error in the clinical assessment of knee extension strength
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, March 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2474-10-31 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ruud H Knols, Geert Aufdemkampe, Eling D de Bruin, Daniel Uebelhart, Neil K Aaronson |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 88 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 16 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 13 | 15% |
| Unknown | 19 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 36% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 16% |
| Sports and Recreations | 5 | 6% |
| Engineering | 4 | 5% |
| Psychology | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 9% |
| Unknown | 22 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2020.
All research outputs
#7,633,928
of 23,257,423 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#1,556
of 4,128 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,244
of 93,671 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#8
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,257,423 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,128 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,671 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.