You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Lessons learned from descriptions and evaluations of knowledge translation platforms supporting evidence-informed policy-making in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review
|
---|---|
Published in |
Health Research Policy and Systems, October 2020
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12961-020-00626-5 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Arun C. R. Partridge, Cristián Mansilla, Harkanwal Randhawa, John N. Lavis, Fadi El-Jardali, Nelson K. Sewankambo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 2 | 25% |
South Africa | 1 | 13% |
Colombia | 1 | 13% |
Australia | 1 | 13% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 2 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 50% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 25% |
Scientists | 1 | 13% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 61 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 10 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 16% |
Researcher | 8 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 3% |
Other | 7 | 11% |
Unknown | 20 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 18% |
Social Sciences | 7 | 11% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 11% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 5% |
Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
Other | 8 | 13% |
Unknown | 23 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2022.
All research outputs
#2,120,100
of 23,314,015 outputs
Outputs from Health Research Policy and Systems
#290
of 1,232 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,632
of 421,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Research Policy and Systems
#7
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,314,015 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,232 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,003 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.