↓ Skip to main content

Why does uptake of family planning services remain sub-optimal among Nigerian women? A systematic review of challenges and implications for policy

Overview of attention for article published in Contraception and Reproductive Medicine, October 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Why does uptake of family planning services remain sub-optimal among Nigerian women? A systematic review of challenges and implications for policy
Published in
Contraception and Reproductive Medicine, October 2020
DOI 10.1186/s40834-020-00133-6
Authors

Ifeyinwa Chizoba Akamike, Ijeoma Nkem Okedo-Alex, Irene Ifeyinwa Eze, Obumneme Benaiah Ezeanosike, Chigozie Jesse Uneke

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 86 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 21%
Student > Postgraduate 11 13%
Researcher 10 12%
Student > Bachelor 9 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 2%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 32 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 19%
Social Sciences 6 7%
Psychology 4 5%
Computer Science 1 1%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 37 43%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2020.
All research outputs
#10,756,928
of 19,476,606 outputs
Outputs from Contraception and Reproductive Medicine
#25
of 69 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#177,270
of 391,801 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Contraception and Reproductive Medicine
#8
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,476,606 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 69 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 391,801 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.