You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Why does uptake of family planning services remain sub-optimal among Nigerian women? A systematic review of challenges and implications for policy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Contraception and Reproductive Medicine, October 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40834-020-00133-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ifeyinwa Chizoba Akamike, Ijeoma Nkem Okedo-Alex, Irene Ifeyinwa Eze, Obumneme Benaiah Ezeanosike, Chigozie Jesse Uneke |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Nigeria | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 204 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 204 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 34 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 13% |
| Researcher | 18 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 16 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 15 | 7% |
| Unknown | 88 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 39 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 14 | 7% |
| Psychology | 6 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 19 | 9% |
| Unknown | 96 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2020.
All research outputs
#13,354,692
of 23,257,423 outputs
Outputs from Contraception and Reproductive Medicine
#28
of 93 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#196,954
of 420,521 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Contraception and Reproductive Medicine
#5
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,257,423 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 93 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,521 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.