↓ Skip to main content

The global pipeline of new medicines for the control and elimination of malaria

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
8 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
121 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
265 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The global pipeline of new medicines for the control and elimination of malaria
Published in
Malaria Journal, September 2012
DOI 10.1186/1475-2875-11-316
Pubmed ID
Authors

Melinda P Anthony, Jeremy N Burrows, Stephan Duparc, Joerg JMoehrle, Timothy NC Wells

Abstract

Over the past decade, there has been a transformation in the portfolio of medicines to combat malaria. New fixed-dose artemisinin combination therapy is available, with four different types having received approval from Stringent Regulatory Authorities or the World Health Organization (WHO). However, there is still scope for improvement. The Malaria Eradication Research agenda identified several gaps in the current portfolio. Simpler regimens, such as a single-dose cure are needed, compared with the current three-day treatment. In addition, new medicines that prevent transmission and also relapse are needed, but with better safety profiles than current medicines. There is also a big opportunity for new medicines to prevent reinfection and to provide chemoprotection. This study reviews the global portfolio of new medicines in development against malaria, as of the summer of 2012. Cell-based phenotypic screening, and 'fast followers' of clinically validated classes, mean that there are now many new classes of molecules starting in clinical development, especially for the blood stages of malaria. There remain significant gaps for medicines blocking transmission, preventing relapse, and long-duration molecules for chemoprotection. The nascent pipeline of new medicines is significantly stronger than five years ago. However, there are still risks ahead in clinical development and sustainable funding of clinical studies is vital if this early promise is going to be delivered.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 265 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 1%
United States 2 <1%
India 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 254 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 52 20%
Student > Master 48 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 16%
Student > Bachelor 23 9%
Student > Postgraduate 21 8%
Other 51 19%
Unknown 28 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 66 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 61 23%
Chemistry 48 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 16 6%
Other 27 10%
Unknown 30 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2017.
All research outputs
#2,462,432
of 24,400,706 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#522
of 5,827 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,880
of 171,904 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#5
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,400,706 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,827 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 171,904 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.