You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Engaging patients and family members to design and implement patient-centered kidney disease research
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Research Involvement and Engagement, November 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40900-020-00237-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Teri Browne, Amy Swoboda, Patti L. Ephraim, Katina Lang-Lindsey, Jamie A. Green, Felicia Hill-Briggs, George L. Jackson, Suzanne Ruff, Lana Schmidt, Peter Woods, Patty Danielson, Shakur Bolden, Brian Bankes, Chelsie Hauer, Tara Strigo, L. Ebony Boulware |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 8 | 40% |
| United States | 3 | 15% |
| Ireland | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 8 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 75% |
| Scientists | 4 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 29 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Lecturer | 4 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 5 | 17% |
| Unknown | 9 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 7% |
| Design | 2 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 14% |
| Unknown | 11 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2021.
All research outputs
#2,670,407
of 24,363,506 outputs
Outputs from Research Involvement and Engagement
#227
of 444 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,129
of 425,452 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research Involvement and Engagement
#6
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,363,506 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 444 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.7. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 425,452 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.