| Title |
A novel research method for workshops and co-production of interventions: using a secret Facebook group
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Pilot and Feasibility Studies, November 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40814-020-00711-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Audrey Buelo, Alison Kirk, Ruth Jepson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 16 | 40% |
| Australia | 3 | 8% |
| Canada | 2 | 5% |
| United States | 2 | 5% |
| Ireland | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 15 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 25 | 63% |
| Scientists | 11 | 28% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 71 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 24% |
| Researcher | 10 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 14% |
| Unknown | 18 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 18 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 17% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 14% |
| Unknown | 20 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2021.
All research outputs
#1,419,437
of 25,080,267 outputs
Outputs from Pilot and Feasibility Studies
#49
of 1,200 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,762
of 428,485 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pilot and Feasibility Studies
#3
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,080,267 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,200 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 428,485 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.