You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Subclinical effects of remote ischaemic conditioning in human kidney transplants revealed by quantitative proteomics
|
---|---|
Published in |
Clinical Proteomics, November 2020
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12014-020-09301-x |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Adam M. Thorne, Honglei Huang, Darragh P. O‘Brien, Marco Eijken, Nicoline Valentina Krogstrup, Rikke Norregaard, Bjarne Møller, Rutger J. Ploeg, Bente Jespersen, Benedikt M. Kessler |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | 43% |
Austria | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 57% |
Scientists | 2 | 29% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 15% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 15% |
Professor | 2 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 8% |
Researcher | 1 | 8% |
Other | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 4 | 31% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 46% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 8% |
Unspecified | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 5 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2021.
All research outputs
#6,110,146
of 23,257,423 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Proteomics
#73
of 287 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,005
of 420,817 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Proteomics
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,257,423 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 287 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,817 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them