↓ Skip to main content

Exploring the conditional coregulation of yeast gene expression through fuzzy k-means clustering

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Biology, October 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
346 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
238 Mendeley
citeulike
6 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Exploring the conditional coregulation of yeast gene expression through fuzzy k-means clustering
Published in
Genome Biology, October 2002
DOI 10.1186/gb-2002-3-11-research0059
Pubmed ID
Authors

Audrey P Gasch, Michael B Eisen

Abstract

Organisms simplify the orchestration of gene expression by coregulating genes whose products function together in the cell. Many proteins serve different roles depending on the demands of the organism, and therefore the corresponding genes are often coexpressed with different groups of genes under different situations. This poses a challenge in analyzing whole-genome expression data, because many genes will be similarly expressed to multiple, distinct groups of genes. Because most commonly used analytical methods cannot appropriately represent these relationships, the connections between conditionally coregulated genes are often missed.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 238 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 10 4%
Germany 7 3%
France 4 2%
United Kingdom 3 1%
Spain 2 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Other 4 2%
Unknown 204 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 64 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 56 24%
Professor > Associate Professor 23 10%
Student > Master 18 8%
Professor 16 7%
Other 45 19%
Unknown 16 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 120 50%
Computer Science 43 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 8%
Engineering 9 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 3%
Other 22 9%
Unknown 20 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2012.
All research outputs
#5,378,473
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#2,894
of 4,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,824
of 50,691 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#3
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 50,691 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.