You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
On the origins of lactate during sepsis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, September 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/cc11472 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sébastien Gibot |
| Abstract |
ABSTRACT: The origins of sepsis-induced hyperlactatemia are still imperfectly understood and probably multifactorial, resulting both from an increased production by various tissues through aerobic and anaerobic glycolysis, and from a decreased lactate clearance. In the previous issue of Critical Care, Michaeli and colleagues showed that lactate elevation during mild endotoxemia is due to an increased aerobic production that does not take place in the muscle; other tissues/cells may thus be important contributors. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Costa Rica | 4 | 25% |
| United States | 3 | 19% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 6% |
| Slovenia | 1 | 6% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 6% |
| Australia | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 5 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 56% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 44% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 63 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 12 | 18% |
| Other | 8 | 12% |
| Researcher | 8 | 12% |
| Professor | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 9% |
| Other | 12 | 18% |
| Unknown | 12 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 43 | 66% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 3 | 5% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 12 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2020.
All research outputs
#3,792,043
of 25,507,011 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#2,870
of 6,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,552
of 187,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#19
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,507,011 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,577 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 187,046 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.