You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evaluation of three-dimensional acromiohumeral distance in the standing position and comparison with its conventional measuring methods
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, September 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13018-020-01935-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yuki Yoshida, Noboru Matsumura, Yoshitake Yamada, Minoru Yamada, Yoichi Yokoyama, Morio Matsumoto, Masaya Nakamura, Takeo Nagura, Masahiro Jinzaki |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 17% |
| Italy | 1 | 17% |
| United States | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 16 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 25% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 13% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 5 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 19% |
| Engineering | 2 | 13% |
| Unknown | 7 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2021.
All research outputs
#8,254,404
of 25,547,904 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#366
of 1,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#170,459
of 430,802 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#24
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,547,904 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,635 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,802 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.