You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Why brain-controlled neuroprosthetics matter: mechanisms underlying electrical stimulation of muscles and nerves in rehabilitation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BioMedical Engineering OnLine, November 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12938-020-00824-w |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Matija Milosevic, Cesar Marquez-Chin, Kei Masani, Masayuki Hirata, Taishin Nomura, Milos R. Popovic, Kimitaka Nakazawa |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 3 | 27% |
| Japan | 2 | 18% |
| Brazil | 1 | 9% |
| Australia | 1 | 9% |
| United States | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 3 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 82% |
| Scientists | 2 | 18% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 102 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 23 | 23% |
| Researcher | 14 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 16 | 16% |
| Unknown | 32 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 25 | 25% |
| Neuroscience | 12 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Unknown | 39 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2022.
All research outputs
#3,625,027
of 23,257,423 outputs
Outputs from BioMedical Engineering OnLine
#84
of 833 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,528
of 420,818 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioMedical Engineering OnLine
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,257,423 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 833 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,818 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them