↓ Skip to main content

In vitro differentiation of W8B2+ human cardiac stem cells: gene expression of ionic channels and spontaneous calcium activity

Overview of attention for article published in Cellular & Molecular Biology Letters, November 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
In vitro differentiation of W8B2+ human cardiac stem cells: gene expression of ionic channels and spontaneous calcium activity
Published in
Cellular & Molecular Biology Letters, November 2020
DOI 10.1186/s11658-020-00242-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Oualid Ayad, Zeina R. Al Sayed, Stéphane Sebille, Christophe Magaud, Charles-Albert Chapotte-Baldacci, Christophe Jayle, Jean-François Faivre, Nathalie Gaborit, Aurélien Chatelier, Patrick Bois

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2020.
All research outputs
#11,407,464
of 19,680,162 outputs
Outputs from Cellular & Molecular Biology Letters
#66
of 347 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#194,078
of 391,956 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cellular & Molecular Biology Letters
#4
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,680,162 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 347 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 391,956 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.