You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Challenges to effective and autonomous genetic testing and counseling for ethno-cultural minorities: a qualitative study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Ethics, October 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12910-020-00537-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nehama Cohen-Kfir, Miriam Ethel Bentwich, Andrew Kent, Nomy Dickman, Mary Tanus, Basem Higazi, Limor Kalfon, Mary Rudolf, Tzipora C. Falik-Zaccai |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 64 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 8% |
| Researcher | 5 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 8 | 13% |
| Unknown | 29 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 16% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 13% |
| Unknown | 30 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 November 2020.
All research outputs
#14,027,905
of 23,262,131 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Ethics
#737
of 1,009 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#214,407
of 416,030 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Ethics
#23
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,262,131 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,009 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 416,030 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.