You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Can virtual reality improve traditional anatomy education programmes? A mixed-methods study on the use of a 3D skull model
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Education, October 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12909-020-02255-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shi Chen, Jiawei Zhu, Cheng Cheng, Zhouxian Pan, Lingshan Liu, Jianhua Du, Xinhua Shen, Zhen Shen, Huijuan Zhu, Jihai Liu, Hua Yang, Chao Ma, Hui Pan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 202 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 202 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 7% |
| Researcher | 15 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 14 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 6% |
| Other | 44 | 22% |
| Unknown | 82 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 42 | 21% |
| Computer Science | 15 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 14 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Arts and Humanities | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 31 | 15% |
| Unknown | 89 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2022.
All research outputs
#3,352,238
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#564
of 4,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,449
of 443,708 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#19
of 103 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,046 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,708 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 103 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.