You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Why technology matters as much as science in improving healthcare
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, September 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1472-6947-12-103 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Robert J Szczerba, Marco D Huesch |
Abstract |
More than half a million new items of biomedical research are generated every year and added to Medline. How successful are we at applying this steady accumulation of scientific knowledge and so improving the practice of medicine in the USA? |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 4 | 36% |
India | 2 | 18% |
Canada | 1 | 9% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 3 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 7 | 64% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 27% |
Scientists | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 4% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
Austria | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 73 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 19% |
Student > Master | 15 | 19% |
Other | 7 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 6% |
Other | 16 | 21% |
Unknown | 14 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 22% |
Social Sciences | 11 | 14% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 8 | 10% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 8% |
Engineering | 6 | 8% |
Other | 12 | 15% |
Unknown | 18 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2013.
All research outputs
#3,862,191
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#322
of 2,025 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,741
of 169,427 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#8
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,025 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,427 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.