You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Pilot randomised clinical trial of an eHealth, self-management support intervention (iVERVE) for stroke: feasibility assessment in survivors 12–24 months post-event
|
---|---|
Published in |
Pilot and Feasibility Studies, November 2020
|
DOI | 10.1186/s40814-020-00706-x |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Dominique A. Cadilhac, Nadine E. Andrew, Doreen Busingye, Jan Cameron, Amanda G. Thrift, Tara Purvis, Jonathan C. Li, Ian Kneebone, Vincent Thijs, Maree L. Hackett, Natasha A. Lannin, Monique F. Kilkenny |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 6 | 46% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 15% |
Curaçao | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 4 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 10 | 77% |
Scientists | 3 | 23% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 86 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 8% |
Researcher | 6 | 7% |
Student > Master | 6 | 7% |
Librarian | 4 | 5% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
Other | 16 | 19% |
Unknown | 43 | 50% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 19% |
Psychology | 8 | 9% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 6% |
Social Sciences | 4 | 5% |
Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
Other | 4 | 5% |
Unknown | 47 | 55% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2020.
All research outputs
#3,975,281
of 24,859,977 outputs
Outputs from Pilot and Feasibility Studies
#234
of 1,192 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,982
of 427,676 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pilot and Feasibility Studies
#9
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,859,977 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,192 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,676 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.