| Title |
Elevating the uses of storytelling approaches within Indigenous health research: a critical and participatory scoping review protocol involving Indigenous people and settlers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Systematic Reviews, November 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13643-020-01503-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kendra L. Rieger, Sarah Gazan, Marlyn Bennett, Mandy Buss, Anna M. Chudyk, Lillian Cook, Sherry Copenace, Cindy Garson, Thomas F. Hack, Bobbie Hornan, Tara Horrill, Mabel Horton, Sandra Howard, Janice Linton, Donna Martin, Kim McPherson, Jennifer Moore Rattray, Wanda Phillips-Beck, Rebecca Sinclair, Annette S. H. Schultz |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 5 | 45% |
| Djibouti | 1 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 4 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 6 | 55% |
| Members of the public | 5 | 45% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 109 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 14 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 10% |
| Researcher | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 20 | 18% |
| Unknown | 41 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 16 | 15% |
| Arts and Humanities | 10 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 6% |
| Psychology | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 15 | 14% |
| Unknown | 46 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2021.
All research outputs
#4,982,239
of 24,860,845 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#970
of 2,167 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,193
of 427,441 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#33
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,860,845 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,167 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,441 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.