| Title |
Case study research for better evaluations of complex interventions: rationale and challenges
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medicine, November 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12916-020-01777-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sara Paparini, Judith Green, Chrysanthi Papoutsi, Jamie Murdoch, Mark Petticrew, Trish Greenhalgh, Benjamin Hanckel, Sara Shaw |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 58 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 23 | 40% |
| Australia | 2 | 3% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 2% |
| Austria | 1 | 2% |
| Ireland | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Portugal | 1 | 2% |
| Norway | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 27 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 33 | 57% |
| Scientists | 19 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 199 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 199 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 27 | 14% |
| Researcher | 19 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 10% |
| Lecturer | 12 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 39 | 20% |
| Unknown | 72 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 23 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 19 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 9% |
| Psychology | 11 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 40 | 20% |
| Unknown | 79 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2022.
All research outputs
#1,134,646
of 25,392,205 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#809
of 3,999 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,904
of 424,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#26
of 129 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,205 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,999 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 424,660 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 129 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.