| Title |
The Integrated Tracking, Referral, and Electronic Decision Support, and Care Coordination (I-TREC) program: scalable strategies for the management of hypertension and diabetes within the government healthcare system of India
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, November 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12913-020-05851-w |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shivani A. Patel, Hanspria Sharma, Sailesh Mohan, Mary Beth Weber, Devraj Jindal, Prashant Jarhyan, Priti Gupta, Rakshit Sharma, Mumtaj Ali, Mohammed K. Ali, K. M. Venkat Narayan, Dorairaj Prabhakaran, Yashdeep Gupta, Ambuj Roy, Nikhil Tandon |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 40% |
| India | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 40% |
| Scientists | 2 | 40% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 147 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 14 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 9% |
| Researcher | 12 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 7% |
| Other | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 27 | 18% |
| Unknown | 62 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 18 | 12% |
| Unknown | 72 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2020.
All research outputs
#7,534,018
of 23,262,131 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#3,728
of 7,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#162,200
of 418,672 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#68
of 147 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,262,131 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,786 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 418,672 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 147 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.