You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Influence of time between last myocardial infarction and prophylactic implantable defibrillator implant on device detections and therapies. “Routine Practice” data from the SEARCH MI registry
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, September 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2261-12-72 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Giuseppe Boriani, Gianluca Botto, Maurizio Lunati, Alessandro Proclemer, Boris Schmidt, Ali Erdogan, Werner Rauhe, Mauro Biffi, Elisabetta Santi, Daniel Becker, Marc Messier, Massimo Santini |
Abstract |
A multicenter European Registry, SEARCH-MI, was instituted in the year 2002 in order to assess patients' outcomes and ICD interventions in patients with a previous MI and depressed LV function, treated with an ICD according to MADIT II results. In this analysis, we evaluate the influence of the time elapsed between last myocardial infarction (MI) and prophylactic cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implant on device activations. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
India | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Ukraine | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 18 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Professor | 2 | 11% |
Other | 2 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 11% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 11% |
Other | 5 | 26% |
Unknown | 4 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 53% |
Psychology | 2 | 11% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 5 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2012.
All research outputs
#18,314,922
of 22,678,224 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
#1,094
of 1,589 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,375
of 168,561 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
#21
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,678,224 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,589 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,561 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.