| Title |
Development and implementation of an end-of-shift clinical debriefing method for emergency departments during COVID-19
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Advances in Simulation, November 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s41077-020-00150-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jean-Christophe Servotte, T. Bram Welch-Horan, Paul Mullan, Justine Piazza, Alexandre Ghuysen, Demian Szyld |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 38% |
| Italy | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 3% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Mexico | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 12 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 52% |
| Scientists | 7 | 24% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 21% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 81 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 14% |
| Other | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 6% |
| Librarian | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 19 | 23% |
| Unknown | 22 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 23% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 14% |
| Unknown | 24 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2021.
All research outputs
#1,930,932
of 25,393,455 outputs
Outputs from Advances in Simulation
#91
of 275 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,570
of 424,562 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in Simulation
#4
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,393,455 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 275 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 424,562 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.