You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Oral health conditions and frailty in Mexican community-dwelling elderly: a cross sectional analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, September 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-12-773 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Roberto Carlos Castrejón-Pérez, S Aída Borges-Yáñez, Luis M Gutiérrez-Robledo, J Alberto Ávila-Funes |
| Abstract |
Oral health is an important component of general well-being for the elderly. Oral health-related problems include loss of teeth, nonfunctional removable dental prostheses, lesions of the oral mucosa, periodontitis, and root caries. They affect food selection, speaking ability, mastication, social relations, and quality of life. Frailty is a geriatric syndrome that confers vulnerability to negative health-related outcomes. The association between oral health and frailty has not been explored thoroughly. This study sought to identify associations between the presence of some oral health conditions, and frailty status among Mexican community-dwelling elderly. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 33% |
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 272 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 3 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 266 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 34 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 31 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 10% |
| Researcher | 26 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 25 | 9% |
| Other | 62 | 23% |
| Unknown | 67 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 114 | 42% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 23 | 8% |
| Psychology | 10 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 27 | 10% |
| Unknown | 84 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2014.
All research outputs
#13,871,657
of 22,678,224 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#9,980
of 14,754 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,622
of 168,582 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#199
of 320 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,678,224 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,754 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,582 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 320 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.