| Title |
Atraumatic restorative treatment compared to the Hall Technique for occluso-proximal carious lesions in primary molars; 36-month follow-up of a randomised control trial in a school setting
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Oral Health, November 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12903-020-01298-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mariana Pinheiro Araujo, Nicola Patricia Innes, Clarissa Calil Bonifácio, Daniela Hesse, Isabel Cristina Olegário, Fausto Medeiros Mendes, Daniela Prócida Raggio |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 181 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 181 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 9 | 5% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 36 | 20% |
| Unknown | 73 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 74 | 41% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 8 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 10 | 6% |
| Unknown | 74 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2020.
All research outputs
#14,522,577
of 23,262,131 outputs
Outputs from BMC Oral Health
#643
of 1,524 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#226,408
of 415,600 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Oral Health
#13
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,262,131 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,524 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 415,600 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.