↓ Skip to main content

Effectiveness of struvite precipitation and ammonia stripping for recovery of phosphorus and nitrogen from anaerobic digestate: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Evidence, November 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
131 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effectiveness of struvite precipitation and ammonia stripping for recovery of phosphorus and nitrogen from anaerobic digestate: a systematic review
Published in
Environmental Evidence, November 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13750-020-00211-x
Authors

Dag Lorick, Biljana Macura, Marcus Ahlström, Anders Grimvall, Robin Harder

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 131 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 17%
Student > Master 18 14%
Researcher 17 13%
Student > Bachelor 14 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 5%
Other 11 8%
Unknown 42 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 23 18%
Environmental Science 20 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 8%
Chemical Engineering 5 4%
Energy 3 2%
Other 18 14%
Unknown 52 40%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2021.
All research outputs
#11,350,335
of 19,884,221 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Evidence
#221
of 263 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#186,939
of 390,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Evidence
#26
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,884,221 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 263 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 390,210 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.