↓ Skip to main content

Classification of positive blood cultures: computer algorithms versus physicians' assessment - development of tools for surveillance of bloodstream infection prognosis using population-based…

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Classification of positive blood cultures: computer algorithms versus physicians' assessment - development of tools for surveillance of bloodstream infection prognosis using population-based laboratory databases
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology, September 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2288-12-139
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kim O Gradel, Jenny Dahl Knudsen, Magnus Arpi, Christian Østergaard, Henrik C Schønheyder, Mette Søgaard, for the Danish Collaborative Bacteraemia Network (DACOBAN)

Abstract

Information from blood cultures is utilized for infection control, public health surveillance, and clinical outcome research. This information can be enriched by physicians' assessments of positive blood cultures, which are, however, often available from selected patient groups or pathogens only. The aim of this work was to determine whether patients with positive blood cultures can be classified effectively for outcome research in epidemiological studies by the use of administrative data and computer algorithms, taking physicians' assessments as reference.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Iceland 1 3%
Denmark 1 3%
Unknown 37 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 21%
Other 7 18%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Student > Master 4 10%
Researcher 4 10%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 10 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 49%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 11 28%