↓ Skip to main content

Transitioning to digital first line intervention – validation of a brief online screener for early identification of a suspected eating disorder: study protocol

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Eating Disorders, November 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
125 Mendeley
Title
Transitioning to digital first line intervention – validation of a brief online screener for early identification of a suspected eating disorder: study protocol
Published in
Journal of Eating Disorders, November 2020
DOI 10.1186/s40337-020-00339-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emma Bryant, Jane Miskovic-Wheatley, Stephen Touyz, Ross D. Crosby, Eyza Koreshe, Li Cao, Sarah Maguire

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 125 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 15 12%
Student > Master 13 10%
Researcher 9 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 7%
Other 6 5%
Other 23 18%
Unknown 50 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 18%
Psychology 16 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 10%
Engineering 6 5%
Social Sciences 6 5%
Other 11 9%
Unknown 52 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2021.
All research outputs
#3,010,566
of 25,355,907 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Eating Disorders
#312
of 955 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,113
of 424,007 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Eating Disorders
#10
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,355,907 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 955 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 424,007 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.