You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A microfluidic platform for in situ investigation of biofilm formation and its treatment under controlled conditions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Nanobiotechnology, November 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12951-020-00724-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hervé Straub, Leo Eberl, Manfred Zinn, René M. Rossi, Katharina Maniura-Weber, Qun Ren |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 3 | 23% |
| Australia | 1 | 8% |
| Germany | 1 | 8% |
| Japan | 1 | 8% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 8% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 5 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 54% |
| Scientists | 6 | 46% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 77 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 18% |
| Researcher | 10 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Unknown | 29 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 17% |
| Engineering | 7 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 8% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 10% |
| Unknown | 35 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2021.
All research outputs
#4,543,182
of 24,380,426 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#158
of 1,682 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,611
of 420,203 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#5
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,380,426 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,682 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,203 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.