You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Cardiac MR fingerprinting for T1 and T2 mapping in four heartbeats
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, January 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1532-429x-18-s1-w1 |
| Authors |
Jesse I Hamilton, Yun Jiang, Dan Ma, Bhairav B Mehta, Wei-Ching Lo, Yong Chen, Mark A Griswold, Nicole Seiberlich |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 26 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 42% |
| Researcher | 5 | 19% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 12% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 1 | 4% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 15 | 58% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 4% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 6 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2024.
All research outputs
#8,675,798
of 25,711,518 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#717
of 1,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,061
of 407,730 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#22
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,518 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,386 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 407,730 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.